Pictures of my recent protests in front of the Unitarian Church of Montreal



A Montreal U*U knocks down my picket signs in a futile act of petty censorship.




Montreal police officers enter the Unitarian Church of Montreal responding to a complaint about my taking pictures of people.




Former Montreal city councillor Jeremy Searle, the perjurious U*U who falsely accused me of "hate speech" and "hate crime" in his depositions to police that led to my false arrest on trumped up criminal charges in December 2000, jabs his finger at the police officers that I was having a civil and respectful discussion with and aggressively demands that they finally get rid of me and what he alleges are my "hateful" picket sign slogans. Evidently Jeremy Searle is unaware of the saying that every time you point your finger at someone you have three of your own fingers pointing back at you. . .

Comments

Anonymous said…
The withdrawal of Mr. Edgar’s membership from the Unitarian Church of Montreal was not motivated by his religious beliefs, but by his disruptive and aggressive behaviour towards the members of this congregation. His inappropriate behaviour has continued for more than ten years. Seven years ago he was brought before a Disruptive Behaviour Committee, where over the next three years attempts were made to have him moderate his unacceptable behaviours. He would agree to proposed solutions and then go on as before. He was repeatedly warned that failure to comply with what he had agreed to do would result in serious consequences. Over this period, he was suspended from participation in Church life for six months. Unfortunately, upon his return his behaviour worsened , and he was suspended for an additional year. Again when he returned, his inappropriate behaviour continued. Finally in November 1999, at a meeting of the full congregation, during which he spoke on his own behalf, a congregational vote was taken and his membership was revoked. This decade long process, during which sincere attempts were made by the congregation to negotiate a solution, ended when it became clear that he had no intention of ceasing his disruptive and aggressive behaviours. It should be noted that Reverend Ray Drennan did apologise, in person, on more than one occasion. However, this did not meet with Mr Edgar’s satisfaction. Mr. Edgar has redressed his grievances to whomever he has saw fit, be it the UUA, CUC, etc., and his complaint to the Quebec Human Rights Commission in 2002 was summarily dismissed as being without merit. Mr Edgar continues to picket the church in the futile belief that the Church will act. Reverend Drennan is no longer the minister as he left to follow his own life’s journey; and the church has simply moved on.
Robin Edgar said…
This is the third time today that Anonymous U*U has posted this fine example of U*U institutional denial that I have already rebutted very thoroughly in the past.
Robin Edgar said…
Anonymous U*U strikes again! Too bad he or she has nothing new or interesting, or even valid. . . to say.
Robin Edgar said…
Here is a link to my point-by-point rebuttal of Anonymous U*U's transparent and quite futile attempt at U*U "damage control", U*U disinformation and U*U "spin". . .