Rev. Victoria Weinstein's Sodomy Fantasy Photo. . . ;-) ;-)

It would appear from this Flickr photo that the notoriously obnoxious U*U minister PeaceBang, aka Rev. Victoria Weinstein of the First Parish Unitarian Church of Norwell Massachusetts, somehow managed to anally impale herself on something during her Nightline interview about her PeaceBang's Beauty Tips For Ministers blog. Presumably the Statue of Liberty's torch was unavailable so I guess that your guess is as good as mine as to just what object PeaceBang might have managed to anally impale her life-long U*U on. . .
Email Post

Comments

Chalicechick said…
She talked about asses once, maybe twice.

You talk about them constantly.

For my money, you're the one with sodomy fantasies.

You're certainly obsessed with asses.
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:32:00 am
Robin Edgar said…
You're being quite ridiculous ChaliceChick. You know perfectly well that Rev. Victoria Weinstein in her "outrageous persona" of Peacebang once aired her "sodomy fantasy" that involved a certain U.S. senator "anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's torch". You know also that I conducted a little experiemnt to see what, if anything. . . the Director of the UUA's Congregational Services staff group, Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris, would do about this offensive conduct by a U*U minister that the vast majority of people of intelligence and conscience would consider to be very unbecoming of a minister of any denomination. As this email string shows Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris evasively pretended that Rev. Victoria Weinstein's senatorial "sodomy fantasy", and some of her other unbecoming conduct that I brought to the attention of the UUA and MFC, was acceptable behaviour that did not warrant any disciplinary action of any kind. Rev. Beth Miller, director of the UUA's ministry and professional leadership staff group, subsequently endorsed this highly questionable decision about Rev. Victoria Weinstein's "insulting and defamatory lkanguage". Some time later, Rev. Victoria Weinstein hid the evidence by relegating the whole post that shared her "sodomy fantasy" with the U*U World and the real world to the burgeoning U*U "memory hole". Most likely this was done to cover her U*U and clean up her online act a little bit since Boston Globe readers, directed to her blog by an article on Peacebang's blogging activities, might not be terribly impressed with her offensive conduct.

As far as CUC Executive Director Mary Bennett's unwitting sabotaging of the UU "corporate identity" by inserting an all-inclusive ass-to-risk between the "twin cheeks" of what is now known as the U*U religious community goes, I have decided to go to town with it for a variety of reasons, not the least of them being that U*Us have repeatedly proven themselves to be *full of shit* and have shit all over me and other people. . . I dare say that I have considered displaying a picket sign that asks the rhetorical question -

ARE U*Us FULL OF SH*T?

or states -

DON'T LET A U*U SH*T ON YOU

I'm not obsessed with asses at all. I am just having a field day with with Mary Bennett's "obscene" U*U blunder for the aforementioned reasons. Likewise I am ensuring that although Rev. Victoria Weinstein's U*U "sodomy fantasy" may be gone it is not forgotten. . .
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:20:00 am
Chalicechick said…
As far as I know, you're the only one who sees asses in all the places you do. I know you are the one who talks about them them most.

CC
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:25:00 am
Robin Edgar said…
Sorry CC but I see a largely *figurative* and *symbolic* similarity to an ass in Mary Bennett's ill-conceived modification of the UU by inserting an all-inclusive asterisk between the two Us of UUism. Oner can quite easily see the asterisk as representing a sphinctre between two buttiocks and I am confident that a fair number of other people have done so even without my pointing it out to them. . . There was a letter to the editor in The Canadain Unitarian a while back in which a woman complained about Mary Bennett's U*U and asserted that it was "obscene" albeit not stating why she thought it was "obscene". Then again maybe the editors of The Canadian Unitarian edited out an explanation as to why she felt it was "obscene". Be ass*ured that members of the public see the *symbolic* ass in the U*U on my picket signs without my saying anything to specifically point it out. One said, "Ca me fait rigoler." (It makes me laugh) not so long ago and that is precisely the effect I was expecting. If U*Us insist on dishing out ridicule of my own and other people's religious beliefs and practices they should be prepared to take some irreverent ribbing themselves. In fact I never saw the symbolic close cheeked ass in the old original UU "corporate identity" but, following Mary Bennett's little revelation, even the less obscene close-cheeked UU can easily be seen as a stylized ass. In explaining Mary Bennett's gaffe to some people I drew the standard UU and asked them what part of the human body it resembled. I got two results. Tits and ass. . . When I drew the brand-spanking new "corporate identity" of the U*U religious community tits were eliminated and only ass and guffaws remained. . . Believe me, pretty much everyone sees the rather "obscene" mooning ass in Mary Bennett's U*U once it is pointed out to them, and plenty see the U*U ass without any help from yours truly.

Indeed I am the one who talks the most about the U*U ass. I can't imagine that it is something that a whole lot of embarrassed U*Us want to talk about but if you scour the internet you will find a few places where U*Us clearly indicate that they "get it" and some U*Us who have a well-developed sense of humour even get a chuckle out of the U*U ass themselves. . . Personally I think that you are engaging in DIM THinking regarding the U*U ass. You are certainly denying it, ignoring it, and trying desperately hard to minimize the U*U ass. . .
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:25:00 am
Chalicechick said…
Well, I've just never seen an ass that looks like that. Perhaps it's a symptom of some ailment that's going around Canada.

If that's what you see when you stand in front of a mirror and turn around, you should see a doctor.

CC
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:12:00 pm
Robin Edgar said…
I think that you have said something similar some time ago CC. It is a sign that you just don't get it, or are in denial of what pretty much most people can quite readily perceive. I suggest that you run a Google image search on *buttocks* where you will see plenty of things closely resembling a UU. . . It would appear that the Canadian Unitarian Council aka the CUC has seen the light and is no longer using Mary Bennett's "obscene" U*U "corporate identity" logo to symbolize U*U inclusiveness.

Oh dear. . . a Google search to freely responsibly search for the truth aka *check my facts* would indicate that at least one "obscene" U*U is still in use by Canadian Unitarians this year. I expect that, like many other embarrassing things in the U*U World, Mary Bennett's "obscene" U*U will be hidden away over time.

Oh well U*Us to U*Us, dust to dust. ;-)
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:59:00 pm
Chalicechick said…
I do see it, sort of. In the same sense that Kurt Vonnergut pointed out that an asterisk sort of looks like an asshole. (Though in truth the eclipse image you have next to your name sort of looks a lot more like one to me.) But, yeah, I understand what vonnegut is saying about asterisks.

The difference is that every time I see an asterisk, I don't go "Ha! Ha! That guy used an asshole to denote that there is a footnote at the bottom of the page" and run tell the whole internet.

You feel the need to bring it up constantly, and in circumstances where it is sort of odd. (And apparently you draw it for people and ask them what part of the body it represents in search of the reaction you want. Which is sort of odd. I mean, seriously.)

Outside of when I teach algebra, the only place I've ever seen U*U is in things you've written. I get that some Canadian Unitarian said something about it once, but American UUs have no idea what it is or what it means. And no, explaining it won't make it funnier.

When I see "U*U," I still think "U times U, no wait, it's that thing Robin Edgar's always talking about." It's not like you're making fun of something we have anything to do with.

So that you bring it up constantly places where American UUs hang out suggests to me that you just plain enjoy talking about asses.

CC
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:12:00 pm
Post a Comment