Crazy U*U AssHats Who Have Their Two Faced U*U Heads Jammed So Far Up Their Outrageously Hypocritical U*U Asses That. . .

They Might As Well Be Anally Impaled On Their Own Heads.

Is a "less than polite" way in which I *could* rudely and insultingly (but otherwise quite justifiably. . .) describe the so-called "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog, to say nothing of a certain number of other Unitarian*Universalist U*Us. . . including some "less than perfect" U*U ministers such as Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris, Rev. Beth Miller, former UUA President Rev. Dr. John Buehrens, and current UUA Trustee Rev. Douglas Gallagher etc. etc. etc.

*If* I chose to be as in your face rude and offensive, to say nothing of obscene, vindictive, and even quite sadistic. . .

as one Reverend Doctor Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang.

If anyone wants to engage in a free and responsible search for the Truth and meaning of what shameful two-faced Unitarian*Universalist hypocrisy looks like, they could do so quite nicely by reading the remarkably hypocritical misinformation and disinformation that is quite regularly spouted by the "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog, and then responsibly checking the readily verifiable facts behind the highly misleading half-truths, and outright lies, including some rather libelous ones. . . posted on the Robin Edgar Sucks blog.

So what exactly is an "asshat" anyway?

The fact of the matter is that the derogatory and insulting term "asshat" was not one that I was all that familiar with until *the* Reverend Doctor*ed Victoria Weinstein chose the Big Fat U*U Fate of using this derogatory term to disparage and publicly humiliate U.S. state senator Bill Napoli in the same "memory*holed" Peacebang blog post in which Vicki The Impaler publicly aired her Big Fat U*U Sodomy Fantasy which luridly and quite sadistically imagined U.S. state senator Bill Napoli "anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's torch." In Truth, the (thankfully) inimitable Reverend Doctor Vicki The Impaler stridently "name-called" senator Napoli a "crazy asshat" before going on to misuse and abuse the Statue Of Liberty's torch by *virtually* anally impaling the "less than perfect" senator on it.

Funny how the DIM Thinking U*U Ass*Hats who publish the libelous Robin Edgar Sucks blog Deny, Ignore, and *Minimize* Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein's Big Fat U*U Sodomy Fantasy as being nothing worse than "tasteless" while repeatedly describing my own behavior as "outrageous" and "outlandish" etc. etc. I am confident that most people of intelligence and conscience will agree that Vicki The Impaler's "sodomy fantasy" can be properly described as "outrageous", to say nothing of sadistic and vindictive, and that her *ahem* "outlandish" sodomy fantasy most certainly constitutes unbecoming conduct on the part of ANY clergyperson, U*U or otherwise.

No U*Us?

FU*UI the Urban Dictionary variously defines the derogatory term "asshat" as:

1. One who has their head up their ass. Thus wearing their ass as a hat. Asshat

2. A person, of either gender, whose behavior displays such ignorance/obnoxiousness that you would like to make them wear their own ass as a hat.

4. describing when one's head is so far up one's ass that one is wearing the ass as a hat. in other words, extreme stupidity.

etc. etc. etc.

So essentially, the insulting and derogatory term "asshat" refers to someone whose stupidity and/or ignorance and/or obnoxiousness might cause one to say "they have their head up their ass" or, to more-or-less borrow a phrase from Vicki the Impaler, "they are anally impaled on their own head."

From where *I* stand that means people like Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein herself, the aforementioned U*U "religious professionals", and rather too many other U*Us, including the "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog.

And just *how* is/are the "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog ever so collectively anally impaled on their own two-faced heads U*Us ask?

Let me count the ways. . .

On second thought let's not, since doing so could turn into a very long and repetitive blog post if I actually took the time to enumerate ALL of the numerous ways in which said crazy U*U AssHats have their collective heads jammed so far up their outrageously hypocritical U*U asses that they might as well be collectively anally impaled on their own heads.

No, let's just stick to one single glaringly obvious *example* of Big Fat U*U Ass*Hattery as posted recently posted to the Robin Edgar Sucks blog for now. . .

In the 'Robin Edgar and the Seven Principles' blog post, which responds to my blog post titled 'Seven Principles Unitarian Universalists Could Be Honouring And Upholding Rather Than Wantonly Disregarding Or Outright Violating And Betraying. . .' this "collective" of U*U Ass*Hats, if not crazy U*U Ass*Hats, say -

"Robin Edgar routinely insults people. He does not merely say he disagrees with them, but calls them ‘stupid’, ‘morons’, ‘asshats’ and other derogatory terms. He even brags that he’s deliberately rude and offensive, and uses outlandish excuses to rationalize such behaviour."

Quite evidently these Big Fat U*U AssHats "just don't get it" aka "they are anally impaled on their heads". . .

I do not "brag" about being "deliberately rude and offensive" nor are the "excuses" that I use to quite reasonably "rationalize" such behaviour "outlandish". Sorry, but I have repeatedly made it abundantly clear to U*Us that, as long as the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, and its ever so aptly named Ministerial *Fellowship* Committee, happily allow "less than perfect" aka abusive U*U clergy to deeply insult and outright defame me and other people with *ahem* "deliberately rude and offensive" "insulting and defamatory language" and/or other forms of verbal abuse, I will return the favor with some "deliberately rude and offensive behaviour" of my own, more often than not by making the "deliberately rude and offensive" U*U clergy in question, and the UUA and MFC AssHats, oops I mean administrators. . . who have condoned and/or whitewashed their "deliberately rude and offensive behaviour" chow down on their own "deliberately rude and offensive" words with The Emerson Avenger's U*U World famous 'Eat Your Words Diet'. . .

Like so.

And as I am doing right here in this very blog post.

And so it goes. . .

If the "collective" of U*U AssHats who publish the Robin Edgar Sucks blog don't want me to use "derogatory terms" like "asshat", "stupid", and "morons" etc. etc. to describe stupid and moronic U*U AssHats like Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris, Rev. Beth Miller, Rev. Diane Miller and Rev. Dr. John (A For AssHat) Beuhrens, etc. etc. they would be very well advised to prevail upon the UUA and MFC to finally get around to responsibly holding "less than perfect" U*U clergy accountable for using "derogatory terms" such as "crazy asshat", "Son Of A Bitch", and (dare I say it?) "SUCKS", to say nothing of the extremely derogatory four letter word CULT. . .

That's right U*Us, for the umpteenth time. . . my past, present and (most likely) *future* use of a variety of "derogatory terms" to describe certain "less than perfect" U*Us constitutes a form of retributive justice commonly known as "tit-for-tat retaliation" and it is in direct response to the UUA and MFC, the Unitarian Church of Montreal, and Unitarian*Universalist U*Us more generally. . . all too happily allowing verbally and psychologically abusive U*U ministers, or indeed other "less than perfect" U*U leaders such as former Unitarian Church of Montreal Presidents Frank Greene and John Inder, to use the exact same or very similar "insulting and defamatory language" against me and other people (or groups) with complete and utter impunity. The fact of the matter is that every single insulting or derogatory word that I post to this blog is effectively pre-approved by the Unitarian Universalist Association in that the UUA and MFC have, on more than one occasion. . . officially ruled that Unitarian*Universalist ministers can spout whatever "derogatory term(s)", "insulting and defamatory language", or otherwise verbally and psychologically abusive "opinion" they care to spout on the internet or in "real life". On those occasions when I do quite deliberately, indeed more than a little bit *calculatedly*, make use of various "derogatory terms", I am simply holding myself to the exact same shamefully low (if not completely non-existent) standards of behaviour that the UUA and MFC, and Unitarian*Universalists more generally, have so foolishly allowed U*U clergy to set for themselves. . . I dare say that wherever and whenever I feel that it is in*appropriate to do so, I will continue to hold myself to the same shamefully low standards of behaviour that U*U ministers are held to, until such a time as the UUA and MFC officially overturn the unjust, less than equitable, and far from compassionate UUA/MFC rulings that crazy U*U AssHats like Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris, Rev. Beth Miller, and Rev. Diane Miller made to the effect that all manner of deeply insulting and outright defamatory language, or otherwise verbally and psychologically abusive behaviour, is "within the appropriate guidelines of ministerial leadership", or otherwise acceptable behaviour on the part of Unitarian*Universalist clergy.

In short -

As long as Unitarian*Universalists continue to allow their demeaning and abusive clergy, or indeed other U*U "lay leaders" such as U*U church presidents and non-clergy UUA Trustees etc., to verbally defecate all over me and other people I will be subjecting the direct perpetrators, and indirect perpetuators, of these and other U*U injustices and abuses to the same or similar "less than polite" behaviour.

As I am doing right now. . .

It's a version of the Golden Rule called -

Do unto U*Us as they have done unto "others".

Comments