Will Reverend Doctor Victoria Weinstein aka Vicki The Impaler Pledge To Never Anally Impale Anyone On The Statue Of Liberty's Torch?
After all it is due in no small measure to Vicki The Impaler's own "violent rhetoric and imagery", and the regrettable fact that Rev. Victoria Weinstein's quite sadistic "violent rhetoric and imagery" was all but officially endorsed by imbecilic and incompetent UUA officials such as Rev. Dr. Tracey Robinson-Harris and Rev. Beth Miller. . . that I decided to take the piss out of U*Us with a variety of parody blog posts that have a certain amount of "violent rhetoric and imagery" in them.
Was is not Rev. Victoria Weinstein who publicly aired the following vindictive, and even quite sadistic. . . Big Fat U*U "Sodomy Fantasy" on her Peacebang blog a while back?
"Here's my sodomy fantasy, senator Bill Napoli anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's torch!"
Was is not Rev. Victoria Weinstein who blogged about her vindictive desire to kick Leon Hatfield "real hard in the teeth" in the 'Please Pray For This Man' post of her rather less than peaceful Peacedbang blog?
Was is not Rev. Victoria Weinstein who blogged about *actually* aka "in actuality" kicking a delinquent U*U youth in his Big Fat U*U "tushie" *hard*, and not just once but twice?
Allow me to remind U*Us in general, and the remarkably foolish "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog (which, most ironically, may well include Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein herself. . .) what Vicki The Impaler's exact words were with respect to what many people would agree was a somewhat *abusive* act of physical violence against the child of one of her parishioners, as they were posted to her 'But They're SUCH Good Kids' blog post on Friday July 22, 2005 -
As soon as the cop was out of sight I gave Clark the side of my boot in the tushie, hard.
"THAT's for stealing," quoth* I.
And then I booted him again.
"And THAT's for stealing CIGARETTES."
Please note that Rev. Victoria Weinstein apparently knew perfectly well that she *could* be charged with assault, or otherwise face some accountability, for her *actual* act of physical violence against one of her parishioners' children, and thus made a point of waiting until "the cop was out of sight" before applying a Peacebang's Booty Tip or two to the U*U of the jU*Uvenile delinquent placed under her care by said "cop". I can't help but wonder if a formal clergy misconduct complaint was ever brought against Rev. Victoria Weinstein for this *actual* act of physical abuse against a U*U youth.
So U*Us. . .
In that the delinquent, and indeed quite abusive, U*U minister Reverend Doctor*ed Victoria Weinstein is, by her own very public admission, guilty of "becoming violent in actuality" by kicking a delinquent Unitarian*Universalist youth *hard* in the U*U twice, whereas no U*U has suffered so much as a scratch or a bruise courtesy of your's truly in well over a decade, perhaps the "collective authorship" of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog, and U*Us more generally, have rather more reasonable grounds to request/demand that Peacebang aka Vicki The Impaler should "pledge to never engage in violent actions against any and all Unitarian Universalists."
And, in that a number of belligerent and aggressive Unitarian*Universalist U*Us have already been found guilty of engaging in violent actions against me and/or threatening me with potentially lethal violent actions, and have subsequently been subjected to "non-judicial treatment" for their *actual* criminal acts against me, perhaps I have some reasonable grounds to demand that ANY and ALL Unitarian Universalists should pledge to never engage in violent actions against me. . . Not that a variety of Unitarian*Universalist "pledges", not the least of these Big Fat U*U Pledges being UUA Vice President Kay Montgomery's apparently "less than sincere" *pledge* to "bend towards justice" for victims of U*U clergy sexual misconduct. . . have not already proven to be not worth the breath they were spoken with, or the paper they were written on.
So how can I be reasonably expected to "pledge to never engage in violent actions against any and all Unitarian Universalists" when *some* Unitarian Universalists have already engaged in violent actions against me in the past, and may well do so again in the future? I have so far refrained from engaging in any violent actions against U*Us, even when they are *actually* engaged in violent actions against me. . . but the day may well come when I have very little choice but to engage in *some* "violent actions" against a U*U or two in what is commonly known as "legitimate self-defense".
Am I not allowed to physically defend myself against violent actions perpetrated against me by belligerent and aggressive Unitarian*Universalist U*Us should the need to do so ever arise?
* "Quoth" the stark raven mad Peacebang?