UUA Trustee Linda Laskowski Gets An "Electronic Communication" From The Emerson Avenger
In the form of the following comment that I just submitted in response to the 'New Orleans Bound' post of Linda Laskowski's moderated aka censored 'UUA View from Berkeley' blog -
:The Board meeting starts Wednesday, so many of us are going a few days early to work with the Center for Ethical Living and Social Justice Renewal.
You and other UUA Trustees might be very well advised to ask yourselves just how ethical it was (and is. . .) for all of you to all but totally ignore the very serious concerns about systemic injustices built into the UUA's clergy misconduct policies and procedures that I shared with you the better part of two years ago now during the April 2010 UUA Board meetings.
I am confident that most people will agree that UUA Trustees have behaved in a "less than ethical" manner in not only doing little or nothing to address those legitimate concerns but in refusing to so much as acknowledge receipt of my follow-up emails about those and other concerns.
Why has the UUA Board of Trustees failed, indeed apparently refused. . . to respond in responsibility to the Spirit of my demands that the UUA & MFC must take steps to ensure that a genuinely just and equitable appeals process is properly established for any and all UU clergy misconduct complainants who have reasonable grounds to call into question the justice and equity of UUA & MFC rulings that arbitrarily dismiss, unjustly reject, or otherwise unjustly and unfairly deal with their legitimate clergy misconduct complaints?
:The Board meeting starts Wednesday, so many of us are going a few days early to work with the Center for Ethical Living and Social Justice Renewal.
You and other UUA Trustees might be very well advised to ask yourselves just how ethical it was (and is. . .) for all of you to all but totally ignore the very serious concerns about systemic injustices built into the UUA's clergy misconduct policies and procedures that I shared with you the better part of two years ago now during the April 2010 UUA Board meetings.
I am confident that most people will agree that UUA Trustees have behaved in a "less than ethical" manner in not only doing little or nothing to address those legitimate concerns but in refusing to so much as acknowledge receipt of my follow-up emails about those and other concerns.
Why has the UUA Board of Trustees failed, indeed apparently refused. . . to respond in responsibility to the Spirit of my demands that the UUA & MFC must take steps to ensure that a genuinely just and equitable appeals process is properly established for any and all UU clergy misconduct complainants who have reasonable grounds to call into question the justice and equity of UUA & MFC rulings that arbitrarily dismiss, unjustly reject, or otherwise unjustly and unfairly deal with their legitimate clergy misconduct complaints?
Comments